Articles header

This Week's Film Reviews (Nov 27, 2020)

20 Nov 2020

FATMAN (USA 2020) ***
Directed by Eshom Nelms and Ian Nelms

Santa Claus has gone by many names including Father Christmas, Chris Cringle,  Pere Noel and Saint Nicholas and now a new one FATMAN.  Apparently, because most kids are no longer nice but nasty, Santa has his workload reduced, unable today his bills like his electric bill, and now putting on a bit of weight.  FATMAN is a new American black comedy on Santa that is not for children.  In fact one wonders what the target audience of this film will be, as it is a bold step to invest money in a film that has a very narrow target audience - likely those who like their films nasty rather than nice and with an odd sense of humour that the general public do not get.  And with FATMAN played no less than by Mel Gibson who has been getting a lot of negative publicity as of late.  Maybe people have forgotten and will give him a second chance being the Christmas season.

In this film, Chris Cringle (Gibson) lives with his wife Ruth (Marianne Jean-Baptiste, best known from Mike Leigh’s SECRETS AND LIES and still keeping her Brit accent in this film) and runs his Christmas present shop on a farm near the town of North Peak, Alaska. With his income on the decline because of too many children turning too vicious, the United States government, who maintains an interest share in Chris' business, sends Captain Jacobs (Robert Boackstael) to propose a two-month contract for producing components for a new jet fighter for the US military. The liasion agents override Chris' misgivings by virtually threatening to withhold the government's subsidies, but Ruth manages to restore his spirits.

Here comes the clincher.  On Christmas Eve, spoiled rich boy Billy Wenan Chance Hurstfield, a child actor who has an adult face and looks like the real mean kid) receives a lump of coal from Chris for his selfishness (the film’s singular best joke), and swearing revenge, he hires his personal hitman Jonathan Miller aka Skinny Man (Walton Goggins) to kill Chris.  They should have known that Chris is immortal and can heal from any mortal wound, which he does at the close of the film.

Santa’s good deeds include convincing men trying to pick up at the local bar to go home to their families.  The bartender is puzzled why all the good-looking men suddenly disappear from her bar once Chris arrives.  This Santa keeps weapons like guns and rifles.  He also swears and drinks.  He has lost his faith (I’m just a fatman in a red suit”, he says) which his good wife Ruth, with her British accent tries to restore.  Yes, there is a semi-nude scene with Santa and his good missus in bed.  Not to worry - no nasties on display just intentions.

The climax comes with a showdown, western style between FATMAN and the Skinny Man.  Every bad person gets his comeuppance in the film including the kid who got a lump of coal for Christmas.

FATMAN because of its weird premise does not always work, but when it does makes for quite fresh entertainment.  I would recommend it!


THE GREAT INVISIBLE (The Impact Series) (USA 2014) ***
Directed by Margaret Brown

On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico.  It killed 11 workers and caused the worst oil spill in American history. The explosion still haunts the lives of those most intimately affected, though the story has long ago faded from the front page. Director Margaret Brown fashions her doc as a corporate thriller and a human drama involving the victims while exposing the evils by uncovering the deeds of the secretive oil industry.  BP has refused to participate int his doc, as expected.

The culprit is BP, which had cut safety corners in the construction and operation of the Deepwater Horizon.  The result is a huge explosion resulting in the oil spill which they have up to this day only cleaned up a third.   The explosion is shown through the eyes of oil executives, survivors and Gulf Coast residents who experienced it first-hand and then were left to pick up the pieces while the world moved on.

The doc, through the eyes of a few survivors recount the event of the explosion when everything went dark and the workers on the rig panicked.  One wishes Brown did more research on the cause of the explosion, rather than giving the blanket reason that it was owing to lack of safety measures.

What is moving is the testimony given by one of the survivors of the explosion Doug Brown .  At one point after the accident, he had contemplated suicide.  His wife moved all the material (books, new articles BP pamphlets) that would remind him of the disaster from the house.  Gordon speaks to the camera that he feels guilty working for BP.  This shows that there are good people around, typically the foot soldiers that worked for the company.  A bit too much camera time is given to a volunteer worker as he gos about his rounds delivering food and supplies to the affected residents.  The CEO of BP makes his false promises saying that the company will take full responsibility of the spill, all bullshit as far as most people are concerned, showing once again the unethical behaviour of the conglomerate entity.  Unsurprising is the fact that the company gave huge bonuses to the top executives that year.  BP had the gall to say that the Deepwater Horizon accident aside, the company met most of its safety requirements.  The doc goes on the emphasize that the compensation the company for the disaster offered was less than 1% of its profits.

Barack Obama was the President of the United States at the time of the accident, and Brown has Obama bragging that the U.S. has the largest rig count in the world and a major player in oil production.  And don’t expect Trump to do any better.  In fact he did much worse - taking the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord and reversing California’s legislation to go carbon free by the year 2025.  It is a shame that since the disaster, nothing much has changed.  Congress has not passed any new legislation in safety measures in offshore oil drilling.





MAKE UP (UK 2019) ***
Directed by Claire Oakley

MAKE UP begins with a vehicle first seen only by its headlights, two small dots of light on the large screen as the vehicle manoeuvres around a windy road in the midst of a misty darkness.  It is a metaphor for the film’s protagonist a teen girl, Ruth (Molly Windsor) as she heads for an uncertain future, likely with equal twist and turns as she heads for a caravan park in Cornwall.  She is to meet and live with her boyfriend, Tom (Joseph Quinn).

She is met in the dead of night by the campsite manager, Shirley (Lisa Palfrey).  Shirley is such a character, with such an infectious and hilarious laugh that she could be the central character of another film.  One wishes there were more scenes of Shirley in the film.  Shirley offers a job to Ruth.

Nothing much happens in terms of stories or events in director Oakley’s film.  The rest of the film follows Ruth around the campsite, which is closed after the summer months.  She is working, by clean g up the rented caravans and she meets the other two that work on the campsite,  one of which is Jade (Stephanie Martini) who begins a friendship with Ruth.

Ruth suspects that Tom is having an affair with someone else but is unsure.  She finds red hair on his clothes while doing laundry but the only red hair comes from a wig that Jade owns.  Jade claims never to have worn that red wig.

When moving to a completely new place to live with someone that one is never sure of can be a nightmare and a really scary experience.  Director Oakley knows it and shoots her film like a horror movie.  The light go out in a scene reminiscent of a horror flick.  She also uses shadows to create an eerie atmosphere.  Her camera movement looks as if a predator is lurking around the corners.

The film contains a few light touches for a serious coming-of-age movie.  Jade asked after making pot: “If there is anywhere in the world you would go where would it be?”  When no one replies, she says “Mauritius ”.  “What is there in Mauritius?” she is asked.  “I don’t know. Wanna come?” 

Directly Oakley charts the troubled relationship between Tom and Ruth as would normally be expected for young couples.  But Ruth’s transition towards the same sex as she develops a fondness towards a same sex relationship with Jade is not entirely convincing.  Is this just another transitional phase of experimenting as she did withTom?

The beaches in Cornwall are white and generally flat, as depicted in the swimming segments by cinematographer Nick Cooke.

Oakley’s film might be frustrating to come as her loose narrative of Ruth’s coming-of-age journey seems to be meandering without direction.  But it is for this fact, that her film stands out without falling into cliched pitfalls. 

The film is called MAKE UP because Ruth dons make up for the first time towards the end of the film.  The putting on of the make up is again a metaphor that she has now grown up.

The theatrical release date is November 27th.


STARDUST (UK/Canada 2019) **
Directed by Gabriel Grant

Though touted as a biography of David Bowie, it is really not.  The film’s start is quick to inform that what follows is (mostly) fiction.  The film spans two years from 1971 and 1972, beginning with Bowie on a plane to Washington D.C. to promote himself to the Americans.  It ends with a concert in 1972.

The film also runs into problems with this one fact.  Bowie's estate did not approve the film and did not grant rights to use Bowie's music. Instead, STARDUST has Bowie performing covers the real Bowie performed in this period, such as "I Wish You Would" by the Yardbirds and "My Death" by Jacques Brel.  So, none of Bowie’s hits are heard or performed in the film.

It is not surprising that the Bowie estate did not approve the film as Bowie is painted in a film with no redeeming qualities.  Bowies is shown prissy half the time, always in makeup wearing women’s clothing, clueless, selfish, always thinking of himself, annoying his manager to no end, doing drugs and delusional, screwing up at every single opportunity he is given for exposure or success.  He basically bungles his way through the two years of his life depicted in the film.   After an argument with his wife, he annoys the audience by noisily plucking away at the piano.  The film also shows all of Bowie’s failures rather than his successes. 

The most recognizable song in the film is not any David Bowie song.  No “China Girl” or “(You Will) Set the World on Fire” but Anthony Newley’s “What Kind of Fool Am I?” reflecting Bowie’s foolish character depicted in the film.  The film’s climax is Bowie’s stage performance, where once he succeeds in winning fans.  Again the film is not allowed to showcase any of Bowie’s songs resulting in a climatic letdown.

Bowie’s wife, Angie is featured in the film.  In real life, she was his first wife who married him in order to get citizenship and she admitted that they never loved each other.  Angie’s first appearance shows her nastiness as she reproaches a girl hitting on Bowie.  No love is shown between the pair, though at one point she complains that when on tour, Bowie never thinks of her.

Bowie, in real life claimed he was a homosexual and later than he was bisexual.  Was Bowie the man really that confused or delusional?  His brother Terry was committed to an asylum and Bowie is afraid he would have similar problems.  Bowie’s gayness is hinted at in the film, but no same sex scenes are on display.  Bowie wears a man dress and lady shoes and exhibita\s a lot of effeminate mannerisms.

Johnny Flynn who looks like Bowie and even more with his hair dyed red and wearing his famous garb, is passable as Bowie.

One wonders the reason they made a film on Bowie when such an awful picture is painted on the famous singer/songwriter.  The film is equally tedious with little insight provided on Bowie.

STARDUST opens select theatres, and across all digital and on-demand platforms November 27.





Directed by David Gregory

TALES OF THE UNCANNY is simply a  documentary about Horror anthology films.  The doc directed by David Gregory is a guilty pleasure, nothing really extraordinary but it contains short interviews of 60 experts in this area together with assembled clips from a whole lot of experts.  The experts, who include legendary directors like Joe Dante and Roger Corman also talk to the camera giving their two cents worth on the subject.  It is a wonder why no one has thought or done this before as is simply heaven for any horror fan to see this.  It also allows fans to make lists of what horror films to see next, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic.

My personal BEST horror anthology is the 1945 British classic DEAD OF NIGHT (not to be confused by another American film made much later of the same title and a TV program) with various directors that include Basil Dearden and Alberto Cavalcanti.  The framing story concerns a man visiting a country manor where he meets guests that tell each of their horror stories.  The film ends with the man getting up from a nightmare and travelling to he same country mansion.  The best and the last of these stories is the one of the ventriloquist played by Michael Redgrave who believes that his dummy is alive.  Creepy, scary and extremely well done, watching TALES OF THE UNCANNY makes me want to see this classic again next.  DEAD OF NIGHT is totally enjoyable with a bite of the British humour embedded in the scares.

Among the pleasures are watching the clips from the old Masters.  There is a hidden gem that I never knew about - a short horror film called TONY DAMMIT by Italian Master Federico Fellini from the anthology called  SPIRITS OF THE DEAD. Dario Argento and Mario Bava, two horror Masters are also mentioned as well as horror film production studios like American International Pictures and Hammer films

The doc also includes a few horror features and a few international classics.  The Japanese WOMAN IN THE SNOW shows the typical Japanese scary apparition of the long haired female ghoul, which likely inspired all the new Japanese films like the killer doll and video films. 

The best of the lot, according to the experts is 1980’s CREEPSHOW.  Everyone’s favourite seems to be the episode with Stephen King playing the hick farmhand who discovers a meteor had landed in his backyard.  “Meteor shit” is the term he uses of the green slime the meteor getsonnhis body. The doc ends with a list of the best anthology films followed by the best of the short features as selected by the 60 talents.  DEAD OF NIGHT was voted the second best of the list.

These are in order:

  • The Twilight Zone
  • Night Gallery
  • Tales of Terror
  • Black Mirror 
  • Dead of Night
  • Creepshow (1980)

            The doc also lists the best of the individual segments.

Tickets and further details on the Winnipeg Cinematheque virtual theatrical run can be found here: https://winnipegfilmgroup.com/event/tales-of-the-uncanny/


ZAPPA (USA 2020) ***1/2

Directed by Alex Winter

ZAPPA is the long due documentary of Frank Zappa who passed away in 1993.  Frank Vincent Zappa was an American singer-songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, composer, and bandleader.   His work is characterized by nonconformity, free-form improvisation, sound experiments, musical virtuosity, and satire of American culture.   In a career spanning more than 30 years, Zappa composed rock, pop, jazz, jazz fusion, orchestral and musique concrète works, and produced almost all of the 60-plus albums that he released with his band the Mothers of Invention and as a solo artist.   As a self-taught composer and performer, Zappa's diverse musical influences led him to create music that was sometimes difficult to categorize. While in his teens, he acquired a taste for 20th-century classical modernism, African-American rhythm and blues, and doo-wop music.

The doc by Alex Winter (from the BILL AND TED EXCELLENT ADVENTURE films) follows the path of most bio-pics.  It includes a history of the artist from his childhood to his later days in his life while highlighting his ups and downs in his life.  The doc also reveals ZAPPA as an inspiration to his fans and mankind.

The doc reveals that as a child, he started music late.  He was more interested in film and audio recordings before he got into music at the age of 15.  He was fascinated with the guitar and self taught himself to play it.   He began writing classical music in high school, while at the same time playing drums in rhythm and blues bands, later switching to electric guitar.  His talent and success led to his 1966 debut album with the Mothers of Invention, Freak Out!, combined songs in conventional rock and roll format with collective improvisations and studio-generated sound collages.   He continued this eclectic and experimental approach whether the fundamental format was rock, jazz, or classical.

The doc benefits from lots of archive footage of Zappa speaking to the camera, working with his band and of course, his performances on various stages.  The doc also reveals the genius of the man together at how difficult it is to survive and maintain ones principles and art in the often corrupt commercial in this case, record industry, field.  He shows his disdain especially at Warner Bros. who he describes in one segment as a bunch of assholes.  He is also a strong force against records/music censorship and expresses surprise that no one else in the music industry would speak out with him  The comparison of China and the U.S., a favourite minor subject in many docs is included in the film. 

Because of Zappa’s early interest in film, he has kept in storage VHS cassettes of every recording he had done.  This allows the doc to show many of its prized performances, which includes many famous artists like Joni Mitchell, Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, John Lennon. Yoko Ono and notorious folk like Charles Manson.

Poignant moments in the film include the segment with widow Gail Zappa speaking of her husband with great fondness and admiration.  The doc is dedicated to Gail who recently passed on.

One stage of Zappa’s life involves him convalescencing after being thrown off the stage by a spectator.  Being a hyperactive person, he started dabbing in clay stop-motion.  A fair part of the doc  has his claymation on display, often to make a valuable point.

Appropriately, the climax of the film leans towards the end of Zappa’s life after he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer.  Being the workaholic he is, he still worked 930 to 5, but with more bad days than good.  His final concert with the Modern Ensemble that ended with a 20 minutes standing ovation says it all.  Director Winter has through his earnest documentary shown Frank Zappa to be a great man who has transformed the world of music through his dedicated work and music.


Search Site

Latest Articles

Nov 22, 2020

Keeping arts & culture alive during the pandemic

in Arts by Meres J. Weche
Born in Kingston, Jamaica and currently based in Ajax, Ontario, social… Read more >>
Oct 05, 2020

Dance for the people

in Arts by Meres J. Weche
Broadway tap dance performer Lisa La Touche talks about her Fall for Dance… Read more >>
Sep 26, 2020

The legacy of TIFF's Planet Africa, 25 years on

in Movies by Meres J. Weche
One of the highlights of the recently wrapped-up Toronto International Film… Read more >>
Sep 19, 2020

Ava DuVernay virtually walking into TIFF as the victor

in Movies by Meres J. Weche
Filmmaker Ava DuVernay speaks to TIFF's Cameron Bailey about social justice,… Read more >>
Sep 12, 2020

Halle Berry on the importance of telling our own stories

in Movies by Meres J. Weche
Actress Halle Berry speaks to CBC's Amanda Parris as part of the 2020 Toronto… Read more >>

Latest on Instagram

Featured Events

No events found.

Join Our Mailing List

Advertise with us

Subscribe to podcast

Find a Job

AfroToronto.com participates in affiliate marketing programs, which means we may earn a commission if you purchase an item featured on our site. These affiliate links, along with advertisements, support us and they come to no expense for you.

Media KitPrivacy Policy | Member Access

Copyright © 2005-2020 Culture Shox Media. All rights reserved unless otherwise stated.