Prime Minister Paul Martin has informed us of his party’s intent to solve this problem through the reverse-onus action. This is where the accused gets a chance to prove that he/she deserves a chance to be released on bail. Other suggestions by the Liberal party are to increase RCMP officers and stop smuggling by tightening up security and searches at U.S. borders.
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, in addressing the issue, promised "mandatory prison sentences for violent, repeat and serious offences." NDP Leader Jack Layton is campaigning in support of stricter laws regarding firearm-related offences.
These plans and promises, for the most part, sound great in theory but do not ease the resounding fear that is growing within our city. They also do not provide an answer for the families of the young men and women who have died as a result of gun violence so far. For example, Paul Martin’s suggestion on reverse onus might prove to be a solution once the perpetrators of these violent gun crimes are caught, but it doesn’t address the concerns of the public on how to stop the increasing gun violence. Secondly, his plan to increase the number of RCMP officers and stop smuggling could help achieve some form of control, but then that raises additional concerns amongst the citizens of Toronto as to who will pay for the increase in police officers. What criteria and guidelines will these officers follow to apprehend the youth committing these crimes? What negative effects will tighter border procedures have on the city in terms of the public and the economy?
Stephen Harper and Jack Layton are taking a more affirmative stance, which is to increase mandatory sentences and enforce stricter gun laws. These plans of action alleviate fear by assuring the general public that these criminals will not be able to escape the law once apprehended. However, it doesn’t take into consideration that many of the perpetrators of these crimes are rarely apprehended. Nor does it provide any solutions on how to approach the youths in order to prevent them from committing these vicious acts. Imprisoning these offenders for a longer period of time keeps them off the street but only isolates them further from society. Thus, it is harder for them to cope and adjust to this rapidly changing society when they do come out.
Out of all the suggestions made so far, the only one that truly caught my attention was presented by David Mitchell of the Association of Black Law Enforcers. He said, “If a pipe broke in your home, would you mop up the water, or would you try to fix the pipe where the source of the problem lies?” He then went on to discuss that, in most cases, you would try to stop the problem from the source.
For many of us, this approach to solving problems has been a means of survival. If we have a problem with a bill, we generally contact the company that issued the bill in an attempt to correct the issue. Consultation from a doctor is usually obtained when we’re sick in order for us to choose the appropriate medication. Although it sounds simple in theory, and many of us approach life in a similar way, we still have not applied this concept to claiming back this great city. How long will we as citizens continue to blame the government, mayor, police force and the judicial system? Here we are, a society under attack within our own walls, and we’re content with waiting for the government to come up with quick fixes.
David Hume, the renowned British philosopher, once said, “Nothing is more surprising than the easiness with which the many are governed by the few.” Even though our country is ruled by democratic policy, we don’t have to sit idle and wait for the so-called leaders to solve our problems once they’re elected. As individuals and members of society, we can stop the violence and free the minds of young children who are getting caught up in this vicious cycle.
I am proposing that the community start becoming a community. If gun violence is a major problem within “the black community,” then let us attack the problem from within. We have to start funding, supporting and creating more community programs for the youth. Do we really need the government to fund community projects? Starting programs for the youth of Toronto is as simple as renting a gym, throwing community barbecues, books, and anything that positively reaches the youth. How many of us have acknowledged there is an increase in single mothers raising children in lower-income communities? Maybe reaching some of these troubled youth means reaching out to the mothers who have to raise them on their own. I am well aware that I don’t have all the answers. However, my voice might inspire others to speak up.
